Wednesday, 27 February 2013

Adaptations: from novel to Claire's imagined movie to actual film

Watched Jane Eyre – nice treat considering I’ve been guzzling sitcoms and fast-paced Hollywood flicks lately. The pace was steady, the stunts fleeting, tension built on emotional relationships and sexual suspense. I felt seriously creeped by the ghost-story element. I'm glad there were no harped up bets and competitions like in The Silver Linings Playbook which I am yet to determine whether I liked or not. My viewership was seriously marred by having read the book upon which it was based. My problem is that I obsessed about how it would be adapted while I was reading it and the third act was completely re-imagined for the film. I did manage to pick the downplay of the roles of the brother and Danny, as well as the extent of the family’s Eagles obsession. However, I was surprised to see the inclusion of elements I considered superfluous – for instance, the torturous wedding song (originally by Kenny G, not Stevie Wonder) which I mused would have been neat to have seen threaten Pat again in the third act, only to be defeated, perhaps if it was incidentally playing at the dance competition. This might have been another form of substantial proof of Pat’s acknowledgement of the past and ability to move forward.
Reading Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy for book club and have been marvelling at the language and intricacy of the plot. Also, working up a mental sweat keeping track of names, codenames, etc. I decided to accompany my reading with one of its adaptations (that is, cheat), and opted for the 1979 BBC series over the more condensed 2011 film version. A third of the way through the book, I felt swindled that the first episode opened with events I am just starting to read.
I understand adaptations aren’t required to be completely faithful. They are essentially a reproduction or reimagining of an already deemed good (read: marketable) and successful (read: profitable) story. Where details are omitted, blended and condensed in time, the familiar tone of the original story should be conveyed through film’s technical elements. I felt the original story of Jane Eyre through the performances, pacing, music and mise-en-scene and therefore appreciated the adaptation. Even with my expectations of conciseness and Hollywoodisation, The Silver Linings Playbook jammed in and stacked on more than was needed. Another peeve of mine regarding the screenplay was that characters explained their behaviour or the behaviour of others. For instance, the audience is explicitly told why Dad wanted Pat to watch the NFL (making up fathering failures in the past) and why Pat said and asked inappropriate things (can’t filter his thoughts, undiagnosed Bipolar [where exactly is the quintessential depression, by the way?]. These parallels could still be drawn with subtle performance and subtext in the dialogue. Whatever happened to audiences making sense of motivations, wants and needs on their own? Though, I suppose this was somewhat achieved in having Tiffany offer sex to Pat without explaining the direct link to her dead husband’s sex obsession and how her denying it to him was involved in his tragic death.
Pitched Project Hostage to separate groups of family and friends. Confused what to do regarding the logline which received positive feedback from film/literary peers but negative reception from tv-watching-family. All in all, they were valuable experiences. After a short time to reflect, I have managed to construct some subversive scenarios out of suggestions and queries. I’ve got thicker skin than I previously thought, but still should learn to let go of some ideas.

Listened to Scriptcast on scene writing and studied beats and act breaks in Grandma’s House and Arrested Development scripts.  Sat down to write the pilot’s first scene, I realised that I need to properly outline scenes before attempting dialogue – I’m tending to be indulgent setting up the premise, plot and jokes.

Friday, 15 February 2013

Beats, genres, flicks - lessons from the past

Big week of development. Pulling my heart and head together. Tossing shards of doubt and anguish.

Thumbed through Crafty TV Writing by Alex Epstein again, focusing on chapters on sitcom beats and pitches. A good basis for Project Hostage but I feel the examples aren't detailed enough and perhaps outdated in terms of genre and pacing. Sorry, Magnum PI.

Listened to the commentary for Extras - Season 2 Christmas Special featuring writer-director-star partners Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant. I wouldn't recommend it. The men even admitted they didn't know what to say. One bronze nugget I took away is that George Michael is a very natural actor and genuine personality.

Listened to Scriptcast  episodes on scene writing, favourite superhero movies, selling loglines with Marie Rose, rising actress and blogger Alexandra Choi, The Big Lebowski, and web shorts. Matt Hill examined one argument that superhero movies were preventing quality films from being made. Hill was skeptical, figuring the superhero film phenomena was merely replacing last decade's mediocre action flicks. To his and my surprise, according to US box office stats, the most successful films of the 1990s were not action movies, but comedies and science fiction genre films. The list was impressive (and nostalgic): Liar Liar, Sister Act, Mrs Doubtfire, Jurassic Park, Independence Day and Terminator 2: Judgment Day Compared to 2000s, superhero movies and their sequels absolutely dominated the US top ten. Hill lamented that movies like Terminator 2 probably wouldn't get produced in today's movie climate. That is a sad thought indeed.

I also took away the script doctors' tips to consider a scene going in three or four radically different directions - a very surprising and hilarious exercise for comedy writing I have found. In other news, apparently Larry David is the engineer of A and B storylines intersecting and resolving each other!

Watched Singing In The Rain and turned it off. Such corn and colour and rapidfire dialogue. At least Donald O'Connor and the noisy cinema scenes still impress.

Watched Girls season 2 episodes 3 and 4 and loved them. Three was a return to form. Four was a risky stand-alone, short-film-ish, thought-provoking triumph. I questioned Patrick Watson's place in it at the beginning, but ultimately, he delivered. As long as Lena Dunham continues to write, produce and act so fine, hey, by me, you are most worthy of nuding up if that's what you really like to do and want to share with the world and be essentially remembered for.

Watched season 1 of The Drew Carey Show which was a delightful reacquaintance. I paid close attention to the story beats and was finally able to attribute a joke that has stayed with me for years:
Drew meets his friends before a date. Oswald recoils.
Drew: What? Too much colonge?
Oswald: Too much - there was more??

Even so, if shot today, I don't believe I would watch this sitcom. While the comedy still stacks up and the tone is fundamentally charming, I feel the format is outdated (hint hint, Big Bang Theory; even you, Two and a Half Men; you shall never escape my scrutiny, Whitney). What's more, the 'Average Joe' premise doesn't appeal to me without that particular cast/generation of comedians.

Fleshed out 6 characters for the premise of Project Hostage I don't believe I'd have been able to do this as effectively going back twelve, even six months ago. The traits and backstories I used to think were cliche, now appeal to me quite considerably. With the right tweaks and detailing, I see many opportunities for nail-biting conflict and stew-brewin' tension.

Redrafted Project Homeless following some feedback from a friend. He didn't understand the underlying point/theme and I admit there wasn't one. The ending wasn't satisfying; I merely saw an opportunity for irony, which would do fine if it were a sketch. I considered writing a typically happy resolution, which bored me at first. But damn, it works for the story and writing it sans the corn has been a terrific challenge. It's closer to resembling a short film now, though, it is trajecting rather expensively.

Head aches, rain pours, waiting tables soon. Will draft tonight.

Claire.



Sunday, 10 February 2013

Working for the weekend


Friday evening - that's two days ago - Dad stopped by my bedroom door to say goodnight and something else; something no unemployed twenty-two year old still living at home hears from their parents.

"Why don't you take the weekend off?"  I was taken aback.  Perhaps part of my stronger work ethic of late has been brought on by a freeloader's guilt or to prove to my family I am not a waste of school tuition and attempts to integrate me into society. I pish-poshed Dad's suggestion with the wave of my smaller-sized Dad hands, honestly believing weekends don't really apply to me for the present. He said again, "it might be good to have a break from the writing and the job hunt. You're always going." I never thought my family saw me this way. I thought that when they think of me it's more of a kid playing with sticks in the mud situation. I felt appreciated, though undeserving of a "weekend off". I always listen to my Dad's advice but I rarely need it. I'm sorry, that should be heed it. Maybe it was because it was permitted, or simply to appease the unnerved glint in a worried father's eyes, that I did indeed take it easy this weekend.

And by 'take it easy', I mean, 'go fucking mad'.

Saturday was filled with cyclonic thought - many centred on the origins of commodities like vinegar and pepper. Sunday was incidentally and almost exclusively 'Insect Thoughts' day. Preoccupied with all the hard-hitting questions of great worldly consequence, I found I wasn't fully able to enjoy typical leisure activities. In fact, they felt like a chore to the extent where I started to procrastinate by bounding to other leisurely pursuits. It was hedonism gone mad. Perhaps this is what Russell Brand's drug-addled, sex-addicted past was like," I pondered. "Only in place of drugs: pringles. And instead of sex: Ira Glass".
Maybe I shouldn't have "planned" to have the weekend off. I actually wrote a list of things to do like I would for any day of the week. Perhaps it was this very consuming need to be productive that Dad wanted me to abstain from. Or again, perhaps, I didn't feel I had earned my weekend. The backstory is this week I was absolutely pepped to discover and prewrite projects for a short film competition and TV series pitch which are both coming up in March. The deadlines are so near and I hoped to have recruited a whole team for a location scout for a locked in script by now, is my improbable dream. I'm waiting to hear back from a potential partner regarding all this and wish he was as enthusiastic as me.
All weekend I had this quote playing in the back of my mind. It's from Andy Warhol:
“Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art.”

That's how I should have spent my weekend - writing, which I actually enjoy. And my stress levels are best managed when I have ample time to plan, write, edit, etc. Dad might work at his computer all week but my leisure is work***NOT PAID*** and guilt has been gnawing away at my insides. Double-whammy-ironic-guilt also festered in my pancreatic region when I wrote some thoughts and reflections and jokes and loglines down after I vowed not to.

Dad didn't like seeing me uptight or glued to my keyboard but for now, that is who I am. And it is doing a better of job of keeping me sane. I still used my weekend and by any other's account did enjoyable things. I walked, ran, swam, drove, shopped, spent time with family, talked to dear friends, photographed, painted, cooked,  read The Silver Linings Playbook start to finish, watched the complete series of Extras, read the paper's arts columns and liftouts, did a cryptic crossword, ate delicious food, listened to my favourite podcasts, revelled in dreamy music and even moongazed, cuppa-tea-in-hand...

But I genuinely tasted insanity and saw things and felt like a ferret all without the assistance of drugs or alcohol. From whence did this maternal concern for drone bees come? From WHENCE?

C-breezin

Thursday, 7 February 2013

Subvert your procrastination: use sweet thoughts to start writing

I planned to commit today to writing.
So I went outside for a walk.
This was as escapist/procrastinatory as it sounds. But I like to think that deep down I know it’s the best way to clear my head and develop my stories.
Except today, because I went out looking for a donut.
Incidentally (or not so incidentally?!?!?!) the bakery was closed due to Chinese New Year and so I walked on listening to Scriptcast with Matt and Eric. The radio show signed off before I knew it and I realised a good hour had passed since I had told my father "I'll be right back". I supposed he was coordinating search planes over unchartered areas of the Pacific.

I was well on my way back home when a light sun shower forced me undercover at a local shopping mall. "Hm, probably re-married to Chris Noth by now," I estimated - so I went inside to stay a while. Feeling blisters and burns of guilt, I sat down on a bench and started writing in my little ideas book. [She went looking for a donut but listened to a scriptwriting podcast and took a notepad and pen? Ha. Nice try. That is one sneaky subconscious.]
Define writing she mused...
Thinking about writing, re-reading mail and journal entries found in any old, random book, napping, jogging, getting lost in Runcorn, listening to This American Life (when they were free), listening to the Les Mis soundtrack, browsing for pastries, watching Les Mis concerts on Youtube, trying to make oneself cry, drawing on one’s legs, finding one’s Mother and nagging her with existential questions while she reads the newspaper, helping one's Mother complete the daily crossword even though she didn't ask for it, planning lunch, looking up new recipes for dinner, googling apple cider vinegar substitutes, plucking one’s eyebrows, reviewing travel photos, jotting down an idea for a short set on a bus, realising one decidedly funny joke, thinking about telling joke to family over dinner, thinking about posting joke on Facebook or that starved Twitter, thinking about blogging it, thinking about posting the blog on Facebook, opting to save it for a script, self-diagnosing the latest emotional stress condition as seen on Brisbane Times, following net links to an award show's red carpet, Google-Image searching Jennifer Lawrence, looking up that girl from the party and her photos on Facebook, tidying every room of the house except one’s own room, looking up the next event on Facebook, browsing for a dress for the next event on Facebook, buying another ugly writer shirt, going to the next event on Facebook and being asked the usual question “So what have you been up to?” and giving the usual answer “Writing”.
Essentially this is one of the more dull, less productive days of being a writer.
Ambling aimlessly around the centre, I realised why people go out to the shops alone for no reason. It’s about the need to be anonymous; to get outside of those damned, confining, familiar walls and be able to forget who we are or what we're supposed to be. We like to let our minds wander from the usual stress and responsibilities and move idly from store to shinier store. Our brains relax whilst we feed the eyes and sometimes our second stomach. The person your family, friends, roommates, partner and workmates recognise you as wouldn’t – nay, couldn’t try on a pair of leopard print jeggings, but the sales staff and other shoppers don’t recognise you as that person. And you couldn’t feel happier or more free being a nobody for that hour of the day or week. Only the second someone clocks you, the new walls of your blissful kingdom of anonymity begin to quake. Hence, the sheepish murmur to the sales assistant, averted gaze from that casual acquaintance and letting of the lift doors close on your father's mother.
Shops mostly sell things we don’t need. But they have things we admire and want and nobody – no feeble, pension-hogging blood relative – should rob you of the illusion that you can access, afford and own those wants with any degree of will or effort.

After finishing my chocolate milk, I decided to return home – by foot again, to the huff and moan of my second stomach.
Food was still on my mind. Specifically, why I and many self-employed workers and heartbroken losers turn to needless, ravenous consumption. I recalled my first health scare. I haven’t had ‘scares’ since, only because my approach to my health changed and has grown increasingly mindful over the years. I can recall it only fuzzily but I must have been slapped / had the shit kicked out of me by a report on diabetes or heart disease one day (circa 2008) because I announced with steely eyes and a straight back before that evening's meal: “Mum, give me all the vegetables from now on”. I used to be rather suspicious of vegetables and harboured a nuclear missile-aimed hatred for onion. Now, vegies and I are like best friends-- except society allows me to eat them and so I savour every bit of oniony nourishment on my plate. The one thing can't do is lamb. On the occasions I've had it over the years, I've found it quite the challenge to chew. I've searched my sneaky subconscious and I really don't think it's baby-animal-related. I can't explain how or where I first came to feel this way. I just know it feels instrinsically baboon. I mean, wrong.
A breakdown of my food consumption today straddles the two, incontrovertible camps of human emotion: fear and love. I love eating nutritious foods because I have a fear of poor health translating to a fear of an inability to do everything humanly possible transcoding to a love for so much and so many in my life deciphered as the fear of dying and losing it all. I used to think about the state of being dead a lot in high school and moved onto pondering the purpose of being alive in university. I don’t consciously dwell on that stuff anymore except when I’m fine-tuning the details of my funeral, epitagh and feature-length video will. That’s technically about my legacy rather than demise, I believe, the girl sitting alone with unwashed hair and tissue boxes for shoes tells herself, before putting out another cigarette and swigging the last drops of her secret-stash, morning moonshine. Really, I love living my life and I fear any and all obstacles that hinder my living it. Because I want to do things and feel challenged. It's so sensible and straight-forward.
Anyway, I try to eat better foods and less sugar. Another wholesome change was rediscovering exercise and running to R&B beats that brazenly objectify women to blow off pent-up post-adolescent aggression that might otherwise be channelled in situations with murderous consequences. I also love shooting hoops and the associated “One Tree Hilling” of my burbs: bball underarm, angst in heart, bonafide fly-girl stomp.  I had a couple of friends express their concern with my associated weight loss - the way one uttered the word "skinny" was akin to invisible talons taking a firm, mangled grip of my flesh - and they scared me into thinking I had an eating disorder for about a week. But I'm not one to eliminate foods (baaaaa!) or skips meals and dessert is more important to me than any family, friend or modesty in a bridesmaid's nothing-to-the-imagination gown.

I do admit, however, that I am prone to foetal-position-self-shame when I manicly snack to offset writer anxieties. Something about the way crackers SNAP and CRUNCH soothes me as if Steve Martin himself had whispered “you are a true thinker, of abyss-like, trapped-Chilean-miner-depths, and you're an impossibly funny wordsmith.” But effectively, things don't get done, self-worth is not felt and I feel as heavy and salt-encrusted as a Sumo wrestler. This does not help the whole living-brilliantly-every-second-of-my-life syndrome I burdened myself with post-university. This might mean the odd mood swing. Yes, try to forget all your preconceptions of what the youngest and only girl child in a family behaves likes – for I, yes, I, have lashed out at those I love dearest. Compound this impatient, self-loathing context with the fact that my family foster a very healthy relationship with crackers and biscuits. Healthy as in constant; permanent; married with three children and a second mortgage. Furthermore, with most members of my family being male, they seem to feel like Kings and – probably, in a typical fashion – get better looking and more ripped after indulging in their collective sweet tooth after most meals.

A classic situation – as in traditional as well as humbly humourous – took place after just licking our dinner plates clean the other night. Dad went for a packet of biscuits. Specifically, to do the scene justice, he opened some chocolate-drizzled, chocolate chip chunk cookies. Brother grabbed one also and both men sat, contentedly chomping away. “Hmp?” like a question. “These are good,” Dad thought. “Yes, they’re a good snack,” Brother added.
Before you outthink me and feel entitled to snigger: yes, I wanted a cookie. Sue me. Guilty as charged. Checkmate. For I, twenty-two-year-old human adult, still regard cookies just as I did when I was sticky-fingered four-year-old. I have sampled cookies for over two decades, far and wide – across all the brands, food chains, Australian East Coast cities as well as the gastronomic adventureland, the baked goods Haven that is the United States – so that  I have now fledged into a cookie connoisseur. That night I wanted to read and write and I was worried about starting and never stopping (eating, that is) and never starting (reading and writing, that is).

Whilst far from a foreign concept to me, I found Dad and Brother's enjoyment of their cookies very intriguing. Just as I told myself not to trust the smiling face of the cookie to break bad habits, the guys were telling  themselves another form of trickery to appease the guilt all the Oprah-endorsed doctors, health magazines and beautiful people  trip us with. It's funny; the small, various ways we permit moderate consumption of food that we know is bad for us but similtaneously fills our bodies and zaps our brains with sensational inner joy. Gluttony, I should have said. It would make that former sentence much simpler but it sounds and reads atrocious. Glut. Glut’ny. Anyway, a darling cookie nowhere near qualifies as gluttony but even still, here was diabetic Dad and Brother curiously commenting on these cookies like they were new to their taste palettes and in fact, the marketplace and entire history of the world. Brother’s remark then seemed to say “Yes, this is a decently nutritious food that we have not previously snacked on but should definitely consider snacking on again and perhaps on a regular basis”. This is the honest to God tone of conversation the men shared.

It amused me and I thought calling them out would somewhat amuse them too. The men scoffed, rather naturally. Silly me, for it seems I had been neglecting my abacus and lost track of the infinite trips to the gym and walks to the orphanage they had made this month. But after ribbing the men I saw my misstep. I had made them feel self-conscious.  I wouldn’t want anyone to make me feel that way. We all do enough of that to ourselves and are responsible for our own diets and choices and lives.  The men knew what they were saying and how they were saying it for a reason. Mum appreciated my point but still I ended up being the only one wiping away tears of laughter like a jerk. I soon forgot I was a jerk. “You have a shrewd eye and make some discerning and terribly witty observations about the human condition,” the crumble of my cookie told me.
Enough about food. Enough blogging. I’m warmed up to write some serious comedy.

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

REVIEWS: plugging and cross-blogging

Check out my reviews of Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters [3D] and Django Unchained at my fun blog. The former is a tad lyrical and entertaining, the latter is more objective.
You could once find them posted here, but I resolve this blog is *about* the writing process; what I learn and am working on myself.
The fun blog has been kicking around a couple of years and contains awfully initimate musings, cynical rants and embarassing anecdotes, hope you might enjoy it too!

    Through the Looking Glass  http://hastalasagna.blogspot.com.au/






Saturday, 2 February 2013

Settle personal life; ready for work life

Significant week for family, friends, jobs, errands, bucket list and personal growth.

A realisation: friends are vulnerable and want to get along; otherwise, these people are not your friends.
A reflection: the greatest weapon against challenge and obstacle is your mentality; with the right attitude, you'll muster the self-confidence and natural talent, give the necessary time and apply the necessary effort to blow it out of the water and achieve success.
A resolution: never going to Valley bars again.

Read Graham Chapman's unaired pilot for Jake's Journey once again. After reading the first chapter of Developing Characters for Script Writing by Rib Davis [excellent name], I appreciated the characters in Jake's family more than I did initially. They seemed purely cliche, 2D, on the page over a week ago. Now, I look at them as distinct voices which are quite telling about personality and function within the family/series*. Although I'm not learning anything anything new from Davis' book, it is reiterating important points that I need to infiltrate my subconscious and become as deep-rooted and ingrained as any part of my natural being. I am right-handed; I remember family holidays to the Alexandra Headlands when I was in primary school; characters lives are a combination of what they are born into - where they have no choice - and what they choose, etc. It's provided a lot of food for thought in the early stages of Project Homeless - and I've developed the mantra: characters are always doing and always have attitude [towards people, regarding special subjects and in all situations]. Doing and attitude. I find considering these actions and approaches helps answer questions about backstory, class, education, abilities, upbringing, interests and self-perception - sometimes automatically. But character development shouldn't always be a case of instinct and familarity - Davis notes characters of real intrigue and value are subversive, with contradictions and ambigiuities to their personality. That is to say, character development takes more work than I, like any writer/young person, had hoping for - but the challenge will make it a rewarding process; a twofold character-building experience. WINK!!!!!!!!!!!

* I wish the series had been approved by CBS or one of the American studios Chapman and co-writer David Sherlock were shopping around at. Peter Sellers played the King in the pilot and Chapman, Sir George the knight. I think I will look into seeing whether the pilot is available anywhere....


Watched the complete first season of The Hour. I was thoroughly impressed by the pilot and rather engaged by the  two subseqeuent episodes, but my attention waned as the season continued. This may have been my personal brain-wiring failing - so much sherbet lately!?!? - but I felt compelled to clip my nails, check facebook, email and news sites, crave tea, untangle my stupid necklace, make tea, etc. Barring the possibiltity this was all owing to a mild case of ADHD, could my level of attention be the norm when it comes to television viewership? In that case, Jesus Christ, have I got some work to do to surpass the subtle and witty dialogue by Abi Morgan. I don't doubt there are more distractions readily available to us 21st Century Westerners. Young folk particularly feel urgency to do, see and be more; hence, mutli-tasking. Or should that be multi-pleasuring?? Sounds crude, but watching TV is a leisure activity rather than a task [even still for writers]. Anyway, that wordplay clearly didn't work out.

Back to The Hour: big, big, big cases of treason. I'm undecided on whether it was credible for certain characters within the context of the era, workplace and coincedental investigation. One note I made in a newspaper margin: Rowley chastises her mother for behaviour she herself is copying. We love our parents but abhor the possibility of following in their footsteps. Second note: Freddie's father/unrequited love makes us care about him; his ruthless investigative reporting, his stubborn opinion, his tongue-in-cheek nature are mere entertainment.

Re-watched the first season of Grandma's House starring and co-written by Simon Amstell. I really love (and hate) the way the tension rises, tugs and lets go in the episodes. The dynamics of the show's dialogue really plays with tension and then of course is terribly funny, awkward and unfolding of story. Went on to watch Simon Amstell's most recent stand up show Numb. Incredibly painfully funny sums it up. I just want to hug the man but this may very well tip him right over the edge and just end it all. He is a precious, admirably honest comedian. I actually weighed up whether that brand of humour is what I'd like to pursue, but I fear the over-analysing, self-deprecating, social-situation-dwelling processes crucial to the humour might cripple me in every humanly way. So, when it comes to writing comedy, I choose to be confident, observant and compassionate. And when it comes to life, I am in the affirmative. [I believe it's a slippery slope, Simon.]

I was recommended Commercial Kings by a friend which I found very amusing - for the entertaining behind the scenes premise, cheeky filmmakers and series' tone, hilarious end-product commercial. I saw the Roller Skate episode; the kids and the small town business made a recipe for endearing humour. I'm glad I saw the show and I will not change channel if I find myself seated in front of the TV at that particular time slot with a guilt-free 25 minute window again. Yeah, that kind of show, of that kind of importance to a busily multi-pleasuring writer.

Youtube videos about homeless people for research (as wholly recommended by Davis). Also, a video on how Jerry Seinfeld approaches the joke-writing process.

Tried daily brain-training games on Lumosity with the end goal of improving my focus, math calculation, spatial memory and general attention. I think it is already bearing fruit - I didn't have to google Abi Morgan's name to recall it for this blog!

Discussed Django Unchained merits and overrated award success with peers. I am of the opinion it was too long and lacked a strong ideological statement/message - an all-important ingredient to any work from an auteur if one would ascribe Tarantino to be one. I'd call him stylish if anything and I really don't intend to knock him; I'm just being theoretically accurate and integrally, unequivocally right.

Wrote little. But thought a s***load. Have a few more funny nuggets for scenes and new scene ideas too. I've taken on board Seinfeld's methodology by exclusively using pen and paper (for the development stage). I'm in three or four minds about the direction and season length of Project Homeless. Today, I expect to be productive and hopefully settle some quandaries.

Claire, out.